Quadro FX 3800 vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 400 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Minecraft is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Lakefield GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 28 May 2020 |
Pipelines | 192 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs GeForce GT 440
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro 4000
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Quadro 4000
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri