Radeon R9 M270X vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
When choosing between Radeon R9 M270X and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M270X and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU.
Radeon R9 M270X
UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M270X | UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - in Laptops.
- Radeon R9 M270X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 525 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU.
- Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R9 M270X and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 7% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 17% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 2% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 6% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M270X | UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Venus | Lakefield GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 21 March 2014 | 28 May 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Quadro 4000
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Quadro 4000
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri