Tesla M2070 Q vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU here:
Main Specs
| Tesla M2070 Q | UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - in Laptops.
- Tesla M2070 Q is build with Fermi architecture, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 374 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU.
- Tesla M2070 Q is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| Tesla M2070 Q and UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Tesla M2070 Q | UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GF100 | Lakefield GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 | 28 May 2020 |
| Pipelines | 448 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 500 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Radeon HD 8790M
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Quadro 4000
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Quadro 4000
- UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri