FirePro W5130M vs FireStream 9250

When comparing FirePro W5130M and FireStream 9250, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5130M and FireStream 9250 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W5130M Check Price

FireStream 9250

FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro W5130M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M here:

FirePro W5130M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W5130M	FireStream 9250
Power consumption (TDP)		150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
	Check Price

FirePro W5130M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FireStream 9250 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W5130M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9250 - in Desktops.
FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9250 - with TeraScale.
FirePro W5130M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9250 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W5130M is 2014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	10−11	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	14−16	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Battlefield 5 is 88% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	35−40
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	150−160	120−130
medium / 768p	120−130	95−100
ultra / 1080p	60−65	45−50
QHD / 1440p	30−35	35−40
4K / 2160p	27−30	18−20
high / 768p	90−95	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p	85−90	75−80
medium / 768p	65−70	50−55
ultra / 1080p	35−40	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	9−10	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
4K / 2160p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	10−11	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	16−18	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−12	6−7
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Fortnite is 47% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	14−16	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	6−7
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	30−33	20−22
medium / 1080p	16−18	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Forza Horizon 4 is 72% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	55−60	50−55
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	8−9
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	5−6	2−3
ultra / 1080p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	7−8
medium / 1080p	7−8	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	90−95	85−90
ultra / 1080p	85−90	85−90
4K / 2160p	−	75−80
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	7−8
medium / 1080p	10−12	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	27−30	16−18
medium / 768p	18−20	12−14
high / 1080p	10−11	6−7
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	85−90	80−85
medium / 768p	45−50	40−45
ultra / 1080p	21−24	16−18
high / 768p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than FireStream 9250.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5130M	FireStream 9250
Architecture	GCN	TeraScale
Code name	Tropo	RV770
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2015	16 June 2008
Pipelines	512	800
Core clock speed		625 MHz
Boost Clock	925 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	956 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	29.60	25.00
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	1,000.0 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1986 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	63.55 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.1	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
Laptop size	medium sized
Eyefinity	+
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price

FirePro W5130M vs FireStream 9250

FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares