FirePro W5130M vs GeForce GTX 280
In this comparison between FirePro W5130M and GeForce GTX 280 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5130M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 280 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5130M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5130M | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5130M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 280 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5130M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 280 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- FirePro W5130M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5130M is 2893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5130M | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Architecture | GCN | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tropo | GT200 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 16 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 512 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.60 | 48.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |