FirePro W5130M vs HD Graphics 530

When comparing FirePro W5130M and HD Graphics 530, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5130M and HD Graphics 530 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W5130M Check Price

HD Graphics 530 Check Price

FirePro W5130M and HD Graphics 530 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: FirePro W5130M and HD Graphics 530 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M or HD Graphics 530 here:

FirePro W5130M Laptops

HD Graphics 530 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W5130M	HD Graphics 530
Power consumption (TDP)		15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W5130M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 530 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
HD Graphics 530 has 62 GB more memory, than FirePro W5130M.
FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and HD Graphics 530 - in Laptops.
FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and HD Graphics 530 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
FirePro W5130M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 530 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	10−11	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	14−16	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W5130M and HD Graphics 530 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	150−160	120−130
medium / 768p	120−130	90−95
ultra / 1080p	60−65	40−45
QHD / 1440p	30−35	21−24
4K / 2160p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	90−95	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p	85−90	75−80
medium / 768p	65−70	45−50
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Dota 2 is 30% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	10−12
medium / 1080p	10−11	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p	16−18	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Fortnite is 63% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	30−33	18−20
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p	55−60	45−50
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p	5−6	2−3
ultra / 1080p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	4−5
medium / 1080p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
high / 1080p	90−95	80−85
ultra / 1080p	85−90	70−75
medium / 1080p	95−100	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Minecraft is 12% more, than HD Graphics 530.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than HD Graphics 530.
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	14−16	6−7
medium / 1080p	10−12	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p	27−30	10−11
medium / 768p	18−20	8−9
high / 1080p	10−11	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than HD Graphics 530.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	14−16
high / 768p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5130M in World of Tanks is 28% more, than HD Graphics 530.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5130M	HD Graphics 530
Architecture	GCN	Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name	Tropo	Skylake GT2
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 October 2015	5 August 2015
Pipelines	512	24
Core clock speed		350 MHz
Boost Clock	925 MHz	1150 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	29.60	27.60
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	403.2 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.97
Laptop size	medium sized
Eyefinity	+
Quick Sync		+
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W5130M vs HD Graphics 530

FirePro W5130M and HD Graphics 530 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares