FirePro W5130M vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W5130M and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W5130M stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5130M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5130M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than FirePro W5130M.
- FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- FirePro W5130M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 6000 MHz higher, than FirePro W5130M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5130M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Turing |
| Code name | Tropo | TU104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.60 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |