FirePro W5130M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When choosing between FirePro W5130M and GeForce GTX 460 SE, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5130M and GeForce GTX 460 SE.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5130M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5130M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5130M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5130M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- FirePro W5130M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5130M is 2300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5130M and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5130M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Tropo | GF104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 15 November 2010 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 288 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.60 | 31.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |