FirePro W5130M vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between FirePro W5130M and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5130M and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5130M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5130M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5130M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- FirePro W5130M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W5130M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5130M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5130M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Tropo | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |