FirePro W5130M vs GRID K520
When choosing between FirePro W5130M and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5130M and GRID K520.
GRID K520
FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5130M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5130M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W5130M.
- FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- FirePro W5130M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W5130M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W5130M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 70% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5130M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Tropo | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |