FirePro W5130M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
In this comparison between FirePro W5130M and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5130M will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5130M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W5130M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5130M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
40 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W5130M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
FirePro W5130M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro W5130M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro W5130M.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
60−65
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro W5130M.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro W5130M.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro W5130M.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−33
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
120−130
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than FirePro W5130M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro W5130M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro W5130M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
high / 768p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro W5130M.
Full Specs
FirePro W5130M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Architecture
GCN
Turing
Code name
Tropo
N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
27 May 2019
Pipelines
512
1024
Core clock speed
930 / 1200 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1500 / 1620 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
29.60
103.7
Floating-point performance
947.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price