FirePro W5130M vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W5130M and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W5130M and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
FirePro W5130M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W5130M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W5130M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5130M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W5130M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W5130M.
- FirePro W5130M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W5130M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- FirePro W5130M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5130M is 1012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 74% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than FirePro W5130M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5130M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Tropo | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |